If passive surveillance is being design, the testing protocol should be detailed for the confirmation of suspicions (definition of suspicions was addressed in section 4).

At this step, the surveillance designer should consider how units will be tested to obtain information about the hazard. The particular details of a testing protocol only need to be defined later, but design of the surveillance will depend on identifying (in conjunction with those responsible for laboratory analysis, when that’s the case) what methods will be chosen for testing the population.

Addressed in the surveillance components overview. Please see page “2- Overview of surveillance components”.

Addressed in the surveillance components overview. Please see page “2- Overview of surveillance components”.

Are samples going to be pooled for testing? Is pooling going to be performed in the field or in the laboratory?

Laboratory expertise should be consulted to define whether one single test will be used, or a combination of tests. The surveillance designer should list, for the screening test (or only test), any details needed regarding for instance thresholds for considering an animal as positive.

This is the confirmatory test in cases where screening is used, or the second test of a design using parallel tests. Information to be documented includes the test to be used, as agreed with the laboratory, and any other important details the laboratory experts consider relevant.

Regarding the testing protocol delineated above, the surveillance designer should consider any further details needed to make sure the entire process is documented.

















This website uses cookies for visitor traffic analysis. By using the website, you agree with storing the cookies on your computer.More information
You could leave a comment if you were logged in.
  • 6-testing-protocol.txt
  • Last modified: 2018/07/31 17:59
  • by thorsten