Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
evaluation-frameworks [2016/03/03 03:30]
127.0.0.1 external edit
evaluation-frameworks [2018/08/01 11:59] (current)
thorsten
Line 1: Line 1:
 //This page has been developed by M.Peyre and C. Calba, CIRAD-AGIRs//​\\ ​ //This page has been developed by M.Peyre and C. Calba, CIRAD-AGIRs//​\\ ​
-====== Table of Contents ====== 
-[[#A review of the Health Evaluation Guides|A review of the Health Evaluation Guides]][[#​Toward and integrated evaluation framework|Toward and integrated evaluation framework]]\\ ​ 
 ====== A review of the Health Evaluation Guides ====== ====== A review of the Health Evaluation Guides ======
-Many evaluation guides are available in the litterature to undertake an evaluation process. \\ Within the framework of RISKSUR project we have reviewed those guides:\\ - to identify the gaps and needs in the available frameworks and current methods;\\ - to provide elements on the advantages and limits of each available guides and to help the user to select the most appropriate approach.\\ ​\\  \\ {{/​file/​view/​Fig_Eva_Guide_Calba2015.png/​576435435/​564x356/​Fig_Eva_Guide_Calba2015.png|Fig_Eva_Guide_Calba2015.png}}(Adapted from Calba et al., 2015, BMC Public Health)\\ \\ None of the guides identified in this review provide a framework for a comprehensive evaluation (including economics) of health surveillance systems.\\ This review performed by Clementine Calba is freely available online ([[http://​bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/​articles/​10.1186/​s12889-015-1791-5|Calba et al., BMC Public Health, 2015]]).\\ \\ \\ +Many evaluation guides are available in the litterature to undertake an evaluation process. \\ Within the framework of RISKSUR project we have reviewed those guides:\\ - to identify the gaps and needs in the available frameworks and current methods;\\ - to provide elements on the advantages and limits of each available guides and to help the user to select the most appropriate approach.\\ ​ 
 +{{ :​files:​fig_eva_guide_calba2015.png?​nolink ​|}} 
 +**(Adapted from Calba et al., 2015, BMC Public Health)** 
 +\\ \\ None of the guides identified in this review provide a framework for a comprehensive evaluation (including economics) of health surveillance systems.\\ This review performed by Clementine Calba is freely available online ([[http://​bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/​articles/​10.1186/​s12889-015-1791-5|Calba et al., BMC Public Health, 2015]]).\\ \\ \\ 
 ====== Toward and integrated evaluation framework ====== ====== Toward and integrated evaluation framework ======
-An innovative framework was developed within RISKSUR project to fill in these gaps and allow for both design and evaluation of animal health surveillance systems. \\ \\ This wikispace is part of the RISKSUR innovative Evaluation framework along with the [[http://webtools.fp7-risksur.eu/evaluation/evaPage|EVA tool]].\\ \\ More information on the RISKSUR frameworks and tools are also available on the [[http://​www.fp7-risksur.eu|RISKSUR project website]]+An innovative framework was developed within RISKSUR project to fill in these gaps and allow for both design and evaluation of animal health surveillance systems. \\ \\ This wikispace is part of the RISKSUR innovative Evaluation framework along with the [[https://survtools.org/​evaluation|EVA tool]].\\ \\ More information on the RISKSUR frameworks and tools are also available on the [[http://​www.fp7-risksur.eu|RISKSUR project website]]
  • evaluation-frameworks.1456972244.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2016/03/03 03:30
  • by 127.0.0.1