Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
assesment-methods [2018/08/01 12:55] thorsten |
assesment-methods [2018/08/01 14:05] (current) thorsten [Timeliness] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strenghts**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strenghts**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | ||
| - | | **Structured questionnaire survey ([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | limited flexibility, based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | | + | | **Structured questionnaire survey ([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance-system-organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | limited flexibility, based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | |
| | **Participatory**\\ **approach**\\ | Elbers et al, 2010;\\ Paterson et al., 2012\\ | Allows to identify factors influencing reporting attitude and perception of surveillance\\ | Time consuming\\ | \\ | | | **Participatory**\\ **approach**\\ | Elbers et al, 2010;\\ Paterson et al., 2012\\ | Allows to identify factors influencing reporting attitude and perception of surveillance\\ | Time consuming\\ | \\ | | ||
| - | | **[[/Acceptability%20and%20engagement|Participatory approach (AccePT)]]**\\ | Calba et al., 2015\\ | Well documented method, step by step approach; semi-quantification of level of acceptability per actors and per aspect of the system, provide context-dependant recommendations, information related to the context\\ | Time consuming, specific training required, highly dependant on stakeholders' willingness to participate\\ | | + | | **[[/Acceptability-and-engagement|Participatory approach (AccePT)]]**\\ | Calba et al., 2015\\ | Well documented method, step by step approach; semi-quantification of level of acceptability per actors and per aspect of the system, provide context-dependant recommendations, information related to the context\\ | Time consuming, specific training required, highly dependant on stakeholders' willingness to participate\\ | |
| * **Quantitative assessment methods** | * **Quantitative assessment methods** | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | ||
| - | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Limited flexibility, based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | | + | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance-system-organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Limited flexibility, based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | |
| ====== ====== | ====== ====== | ||
| ====== Multiple hazard ====== | ====== Multiple hazard ====== | ||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
| | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | ||
| - | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey (**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ **)**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of representativity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | | + | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey (**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance-system-organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ **)**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of representativity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | |
| ====== ====== | ====== ====== | ||
| ====== Risk based criteria definition ====== | ====== Risk based criteria definition ====== | ||
| Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
| | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | ||
| - | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of sensitivity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | | + | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance-system-organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of sensitivity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | |
| ====== ====== | ====== ====== | ||
| ====== ====== | ====== ====== | ||
| Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
| | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey (OASIS)**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of specificity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey (OASIS)**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of specificity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | | ||
| ====== ====== | ====== ====== | ||
| - | ====== [[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|Surveillance system organisation]] ====== | + | ====== Surveillance system organisation ====== |
| | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | | | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | | ||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
| | **System mapping**\\ | \\ | Provide a detailed description of the surveillance system network of actors and actions linking the different actors together.\\ | No standard method available. Should be performed by people with very good knowledge of the system.\\ \\ Do not provide information on the strenghts and weaknesses, should be combined with SWOT/OASIS or SERVAL method\\ | | | **System mapping**\\ | \\ | Provide a detailed description of the surveillance system network of actors and actions linking the different actors together.\\ | No standard method available. Should be performed by people with very good knowledge of the system.\\ \\ Do not provide information on the strenghts and weaknesses, should be combined with SWOT/OASIS or SERVAL method\\ | | ||
| | \\ | \\ | \\ | \\ | | | \\ | \\ | \\ | \\ | | ||
| - | \\ | ||
| - | ====== ====== | ||
| ====== Timeliness ====== | ====== Timeliness ====== | ||
| Line 153: | Line 151: | ||
| | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | ||
| - | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of timeliness. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases.\\ | \\ | | + | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance-system-organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of timeliness. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases.\\ | \\ | |