Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
assesment-methods [2017/05/06 07:52] 127.0.0.1 external edit |
assesment-methods [2018/08/01 14:05] (current) thorsten [Timeliness] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
//This page was developed by M.Peyre, A. Delabouglise and C.Calba, CIRAD-AGIRs//\\ | //This page was developed by M.Peyre, A. Delabouglise and C.Calba, CIRAD-AGIRs//\\ | ||
- | ====== Table of Contents ====== | + | ====== Acceptability and Engagement ====== |
- | [[#toc0| ]][[#toc1| ]][[#toc2| ]][[#toc3| ]][[#toc4| ]][[#toc5| ]][[#Acceptability and Engagement|Acceptability and Engagement]][[#toc7| ]][[#Availability and sustainability|Availability and sustainability]][[#toc9| ]][[#Bias|Bias]][[#toc11| ]][[#Flexibility|Flexibility]][[#toc13| ]][[#Multiple hazard|Multiple hazard]][[#toc15| ]][[#Precision|Precision]][[#Representativeness|Representativeness]][[#toc18| ]][[#Risk based criteria definition|Risk based criteria definition]][[#Sensitivity|Sensitivity]][[#toc21| ]][[#toc22| ]][[#Specificity|Specificity]][[#toc24| ]][[#Surveillance system organisation|Surveillance system organisation]][[#toc26| ]][[#Timeliness|Timeliness]] | + | |
- | ====== ====== | + | |
- | ====== ====== | + | |
- | ====== ====== | + | |
- | ====== ====== | + | |
- | ====== ====== | + | |
- | ====== ====== | + | |
- | ====== [[/Acceptability%20and%20Engagement|Acceptability and Engagement]] ====== | + | |
* **Qualitative assessment methods** | * **Qualitative assessment methods** | ||
Line 19: | Line 11: | ||
| **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strenghts**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strenghts**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | ||
- | | **Structured questionnaire survey ([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | limited flexibility, based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | | + | | **Structured questionnaire survey ([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance-system-organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | limited flexibility, based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | |
| **Participatory**\\ **approach**\\ | Elbers et al, 2010;\\ Paterson et al., 2012\\ | Allows to identify factors influencing reporting attitude and perception of surveillance\\ | Time consuming\\ | \\ | | | **Participatory**\\ **approach**\\ | Elbers et al, 2010;\\ Paterson et al., 2012\\ | Allows to identify factors influencing reporting attitude and perception of surveillance\\ | Time consuming\\ | \\ | | ||
- | | **[[/Acceptability%20and%20engagement|Participatory approach (AccePT)]]**\\ | Calba et al., 2015\\ | Well documented method, step by step approach; semi-quantification of level of acceptability per actors and per aspect of the system, provide context-dependant recommendations, information related to the context\\ | Time consuming, specific training required, highly dependant on stakeholders' willingness to participate\\ | | + | | **[[/Acceptability-and-engagement|Participatory approach (AccePT)]]**\\ | Calba et al., 2015\\ | Well documented method, step by step approach; semi-quantification of level of acceptability per actors and per aspect of the system, provide context-dependant recommendations, information related to the context\\ | Time consuming, specific training required, highly dependant on stakeholders' willingness to participate\\ | |
* **Quantitative assessment methods** | * **Quantitative assessment methods** | ||
Line 58: | Line 50: | ||
| **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | ||
- | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Limited flexibility, based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | | + | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance-system-organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Limited flexibility, based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | |
====== ====== | ====== ====== | ||
====== Multiple hazard ====== | ====== Multiple hazard ====== | ||
Line 87: | Line 79: | ||
| **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | ||
- | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey (**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ **)**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of representativity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | | + | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey (**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance-system-organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ **)**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of representativity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | |
====== ====== | ====== ====== | ||
====== Risk based criteria definition ====== | ====== Risk based criteria definition ====== | ||
Line 117: | Line 109: | ||
| **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | ||
- | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of sensitivity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | | + | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance-system-organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of sensitivity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | |
====== ====== | ====== ====== | ||
====== ====== | ====== ====== | ||
Line 135: | Line 127: | ||
| **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey (OASIS)**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of specificity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey (OASIS)**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of specificity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ | | ||
====== ====== | ====== ====== | ||
- | ====== [[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|Surveillance system organisation]] ====== | + | ====== Surveillance system organisation ====== |
| **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | | | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | | ||
Line 143: | Line 135: | ||
| **System mapping**\\ | \\ | Provide a detailed description of the surveillance system network of actors and actions linking the different actors together.\\ | No standard method available. Should be performed by people with very good knowledge of the system.\\ \\ Do not provide information on the strenghts and weaknesses, should be combined with SWOT/OASIS or SERVAL method\\ | | | **System mapping**\\ | \\ | Provide a detailed description of the surveillance system network of actors and actions linking the different actors together.\\ | No standard method available. Should be performed by people with very good knowledge of the system.\\ \\ Do not provide information on the strenghts and weaknesses, should be combined with SWOT/OASIS or SERVAL method\\ | | ||
| \\ | \\ | \\ | \\ | | | \\ | \\ | \\ | \\ | | ||
- | \\ | ||
- | ====== ====== | ||
====== Timeliness ====== | ====== Timeliness ====== | ||
Line 161: | Line 151: | ||
| **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ | | ||
- | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of timeliness. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases.\\ | \\ | | + | | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance-system-organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of timeliness. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases.\\ | \\ | |