Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- assesment-methods [2018/08/01 12:55]
thorsten
+++ assesment-methods [2018/08/01 14:05]
thorsten [Surveillance system organisation]
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strenghts**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ |
-| **Structured questionnaire survey ([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | limited flexibility, based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ |
+| **Structured questionnaire survey ([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance-system-organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | limited flexibility, based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ |
 | **Participatory**\\ **approach**\\ | Elbers et al, 2010;\\  Paterson et al., 2012\\ | Allows to identify factors influencing reporting attitude and perception of surveillance\\ | Time consuming\\ | \\ |
-| **[[/Acceptability%20and%20engagement|Participatory approach (AccePT)]]**\\ | Calba et al., 2015\\ | Well documented method, step by step approach; semi-quantification of level of acceptability per actors and per aspect of the system, provide context-dependant recommendations, information related to the context\\ | Time consuming, specific training required, highly dependant on stakeholders' willingness to participate\\ |
+| **[[/Acceptability-and-engagement|Participatory approach (AccePT)]]**\\ | Calba et al., 2015\\ | Well documented method, step by step approach; semi-quantification of level of acceptability per actors and per aspect of the system, provide context-dependant recommendations, information related to the context\\ | Time consuming, specific training required, highly dependant on stakeholders' willingness to participate\\ |
   * **Quantitative assessment methods**
@@ Line 50: / Line 50: @@
 | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ |
-| **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Limited flexibility, based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ |
+| **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance-system-organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Limited flexibility, based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ |
 ======   ======
 ====== Multiple hazard ======
@@ Line 79: / Line 79: @@
 | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ |
-| **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey (**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ **)**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of representativity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ |
+| **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey (**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance-system-organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ **)**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of representativity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ |
 ======   ======
 ====== Risk based criteria definition ======
@@ Line 109: / Line 109: @@
 | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ | \\ |
-| **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of sensitivity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ |
+| **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey**\\ **([[http://www.plateforme-esa.fr/node/62|OASIS fr]]**\\ **[[/Surveillance-system-organisation|OASIS En]])**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of sensitivity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ |
 ======   ======
 ======   ======
@@ Line 127: / Line 127: @@
 | **Structured questionnaire**\\ **survey (OASIS)**\\ | Hendrikx et al., 2011\\ | Allows to identify targeted corrective actions\\ | Scoring. Not a real measure of specificity. Based on pre-defined requirement criteria which may not apply to all cases\\ | \\ |
 ======   ======
-====== [[/Surveillance%20system%20organisation|Surveillance system organisation]] ======
+====== Surveillance system organisation ======
 | **Method type**\\ | **References**\\ | **Strengths**\\ | **Limits**\\ |
@@ Line 135: / Line 135: @@
 | **System mapping**\\ | \\ | Provide a detailed description of the surveillance system network of actors and actions linking the different actors together.\\ | No standard method available. Should be performed by people with very good knowledge of the system.\\ \\  Do not provide information on the strenghts and weaknesses, should be combined with SWOT/OASIS or SERVAL method\\ |
 | \\ | \\ | \\ | \\ |
-\\
-======   ======
 ====== Timeliness ======