Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
acceptability-and-engagement [2018/08/01 14:17] thorsten [3.3.1. Impact diagrams & proportional piling] |
acceptability-and-engagement [2018/08/01 14:18] (current) thorsten [3.2 Analysis of results] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| {{ :files:image6.png?nolink |}} | {{ :files:image6.png?nolink |}} | ||
| ==== 3.2 Analysis of results ==== | ==== 3.2 Analysis of results ==== | ||
| - | In order to make the assessment of the acceptability, you will have to analyse the diagrams drawn by participants and the discussions they had during the meetings.\\ The first step of the process will be to analyse the result for each individual interview and for each focus group implemented. To obtain the final scores, you will just have to calculate the mean obtained.\\ The following tables present the evaluation criteria developed to provide score for each element of acceptability.\\ \\ \\ {{/file/view/Image8.png/562257957/556x371/Image8.png|Image8.png}}\\ {{/file/view/Image9.png/562257995/573x268/Image9.png|Image9.png}}\\ \\ {{/file/view/Image10.png/562258079/311x419/Image10.png|Image10.png}}\\ \\ | + | In order to make the assessment of the acceptability, you will have to analyse the diagrams drawn by participants and the discussions they had during the meetings.\\ The first step of the process will be to analyse the result for each individual interview and for each focus group implemented. To obtain the final scores, you will just have to calculate the mean obtained.\\ The following tables present the evaluation criteria developed to provide score for each element of acceptability.\\ \\ |
| + | {{ :files:image8.png?nolink |}}\\ | ||
| + | {{ :files:image9.png?nolink |}}\\ | ||
| + | {{ :files:image10.png?nolink |}}\\ | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | \\ \\ [[/#_ftnref1|[1]]] RISKSUR Consortium definition | + | [[/start|[1]]] RISKSUR Consortium definition |